I see some of your points, but in this comment you move from discussing children of disadvantaged families to discussing the families themselves without making the distinction clear. It muddies your argument, which is a good one.
(This is what I mean: "They" start out being "children of such families" and seamlessly transition to being the parents of those families: Perhaps not, but they might be the children of such families. They might have, at one point, been lumped in the same bucket with the "disadvantaged families" because they received Medicaid and because one of the couple was diagnosed with a mental illness. )
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-16 07:50 pm (UTC)(This is what I mean: "They" start out being "children of such families" and seamlessly transition to being the parents of those families:
Perhaps not, but they might be the children of such families. They might have, at one point, been lumped in the same bucket with the "disadvantaged families" because they received Medicaid and because one of the couple was diagnosed with a mental illness. )