I admit I lost interest partway through (and yes, I get the irony; I wonder whether he deliberately wrote as boringly as possible in order to get people to drift off and then think "hey maybe he's right").

I skimmed the rest; and ultimately my feeling is that a few paragraphs at the end that say "this may sound alarmist, and sure it's been said about every other technological advance ever, but I think I'm right about this" don't really suffice to change the fact that it sounds alarmist and has been said about every other technological advance ever.